Cotte , J (1997 . Chances , Trances , and Lots of Slots : Gambling Motives andConsumption Experiences . Journal of Leisure   inquiry 29 (4 , 1-24Strengths and Weaknesses of the Qualitative Methodology used by June Cotte on her about Gambling Motives and Consumption ExperiencesCotte s  mainly deals with the Economic ,  emblematic and Hedonic motives of  swordplay (2-3 .  Her method is centered on   ethnographical Participant Observation (1 .  The study was conducted on a   nor-east casino (10 ) for 90 hours that was accumulated through and through 30 visits between October 1995 and March 1996 (9 .  This critique will                                                                                                                                                         concentrate on the  analysis of Cotte s Literature Review , Research Design and Methods and Subjects  chosen for the studyLiterature ReviewCotte s  books  limited  follow-up tackles the economic , symbolic and hedonistic m   otives of  volunteer(a)  gaming .  With an emphasis centered on  Experiential Consumption (6 ) which explains the   goal of motives in  pitying behaviors and decisions , the was able to prove its point that the  sympathetic  take on to gamble stems out from the  hope to learn and   assess the game (12 , to have a feeling of a    play (14 , to demonstrate self definition such as   existence a  variety-seeker , rebel , and casino pro (15 , to fulfill the  swear to be a risk-taker (18 ) and to view  cognitive self  com patchmentalization  that is primarily achieved through  interpersonal relationships (19 .  Similarly , the study reveals that  weight-lift for    randy up self classifications  argon  alike evident (19  in addition , human competition (20 ) and communion (21 )  be also part of the characteristics that were studiedThe s main criticism for the  designer s literature  reexamine is : Cotte by opting to focus on the hedonistic aspect of  caper has  found the claim that recrea   tional gambling primarily is a  extend of em!   otion in its most  barbaric  brain  and provides no rational explanation whatsoever on the  creation of recreational gamblingCotte presented eight cells (12-21 ) which tells the reason in a  plaster bandage of  dialogue between her (i .e .

 the researcher ) or other  commonwealth through overheard conversations or  contemplations explaining why people gamble It could be importantly noted that Cotte have made various explanations linking the results of the observation and or interview to her related literature and it appears that those explanations  atomic number 18  scarcely  like to the situations wherein there is an    emphasis on the hedonistic drive (12-18 .  The author explained that the feeling of excitement rush , the unknown etc are the  essential reasons why people keep on  feeler cover to the casino and even bringing their families with them to gamble as  well(p) (18 .  However , the would like to assert that although the first few cells are significantly linked on the theories that the author used , the   death three cells were explained by the author in such an   piercing manner that she suddenly inserts a theory that in no way was she was able to elaborate on her literature review (19 , 21 .  The Utilitarian Theory which definition is not   murder or discussed at all was inserted and was used to explain   stimulated self classification (19 ) and communing...If you want to get a   in force(p) essay, order it on our website: 
BestEssayCheap.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page: 
cheap essay  
 
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.