'Summary: Types of conflicts'

'\n\nAttitude to fightings in totalitarian and participatory societies is the opposite. At starting they are regarded as ab usual phenomenon, and the secondly as an constitutional aspect of interaction between people.\n totalitarian club is characterized by a eminent degree of homogeneousness of the social structure, social order and consonance rigidly modify state control. perpetual attribute of such(prenominal) a ships company is monoideologiya, with its myths. One of these myths is the absence of conflict in society, all in allegedly resulting from the homogeneity of the social structure, equity and equality of all people.\nIn such a society there is no place conflicts, and when they do occur, then regarded as an anomaly, as dysfunction, disrupts the normal rhythm of the go of the social system. thereof the method of conflict resolution: to suppress, legislate power to transport leaders.\nOpposite is cogitate to conflicts in a participatory society, which assumes a variety of forms of life, compound multi-level social structure, coexistence some(prenominal) social groups with their take particularized interests. mankind relations in a elected society governed in the first place based on the norms of legal, moral, and not by force.\nCoexistence of different social groups and individuals based on the recognition of the specific interests of each other. struggle for their interests naturally leads to clashes, conflicts. accordingly the first essential conclusion: in a democratic society, conflicts are a natural phenomenon.'