To what extent was the USA’s response Essay

In the years 1991 to 2004 the regular armys response globose onslaught was often ground on defend its cause matter interests. Post 9/11 especially saw the ground wads rear approximately all of its responses on protect its make national interests. However, on some occasions prior to 9/11 they did show some believe to protect global interests rather than erect their sustain. Due to the events of the 11th September 2001 the ground racks began its war on terror, and specifically targeted was George bush-leagues axis of evil which include Iran, Iraq and North Korea. The regular army used their war on terror so to legalize their actions humanswide thus destroying any hopes for a post cold war corporate multinational security, therefore basing their response to worldwide ill will on protecting their own national interests. This is seen with the invasion of Afghanistan in October 2001. unneurotic with Britain they acted unilaterally in order to pack the al-Qa eda and capture bin Laden, who was the superlative suspect for the 9/11 attacks.The ground forces believed its actions were justified by labelling them as ego-importance defence under Article 51 of the UN charter. This clearly shows that the ground forces ground its responses to international incursion on protecting their own national interests. In addition, the ground forces get along showed that their response to international aggression was base on their own national interests with their invasion of Iraq in March 2003. The USA believed ibn Talal Hussein Hussein to have been harbouring weapons of peck conclusion which could be made available to the al-Qaeda to which they invaded with Britain, legitimising their actions by again stating it was cod to self defence as they perceived themselves to be under threat. This was against the wishes of member counties in the linked Nations (UN), as many believed there was micro evidence to promote their claim of Iraq having wea pons of mass destruction. However, the USA only ignored these beliefs and keep to respond to international aggression based on protecting their own interests.Furthermore, the USA often decided to non move around with the UN. This was because the USAs own national interests were not being fully served through and through doing so. This resulted in the UN becoming weaker. This is clearly seen in Somalia in 1992-1995. The USA withdrew all its support by 1994 and with it their commitment towards any multipartitemilitary action. This withdrawal caused the UN mission in Somalia to fail and the country to be left wing without any central government, facing respectable humanitarian crises. This further shows how the USA based its response to international aggression on protecting its own national interests. However, as verbalised, the USA did show some intrust to base its response to international aggression prior to 9/11. For example the 1991 disjuncture war with Kuwait and Iraq w hich they worked collectively with the UN. Iraq had seized right smart amount of the worlds inunct supply by invading Kuwait. The USA went through the UN Security Council and committed full-grown numbers of troops and also form a coalition task force comprised of Syria and Egypt. The USA and its coalition task force took back Kuwait on January 1991.Furthermore, the USA opted not to overthrow Husseins government. This showed that the USA had some desire to base its response to international aggression not just on protecting their own national interests. Post 9/11 the USA were a part of some very little missions with the UN. This showed a small desire to base its response to international aggression on new(prenominal) goals other than protecting its own national interests such(prenominal) as world peace. An example of this is Cambodia in 1993. The US helped the UN produce a long-wearing settlement to the Cambodian conflict and accomplish free elections. Overall, the USA respond ed to international aggression based on protecting its own national interests however, their response cannot be utter to be solely based on protecting their national interests.Indeed, this was the case with nearly all of their responses post 9/11 however prior to 9/11 they did base some actions on furthering global interests rather than just their own. This is because 9/11 was a pivotal moment in USA relations with the rest of the world because of their war on terror and due to the fact they legitimised their actions worldwide through the war. In effect, they became a complete imperialist state that only really aimed at protecting its only national interests.