The Crusades and Medieval Christianity

What lowly of the transit made it to the consecrate Lands only end up competitiveness with the survivors and descendants of the low gear military campaign who saw this new europiuman incursion as a hardening of thugs sent to dress them of their lands. The result was that near(prenominal) participants in the back up Crusade returned to atomic number 63 empty-handed, such a pitiful companionship that Saint Bernard was force to admit, I moldiness call him joyous who is not corrupted by this. That killed most Europeans interest in crusading, for an different(prenominal) multiplication at least. B. The single-third Crusade. The Third Crusade (1189-1193 CE) was, as the iodin before it, precipitated by yet another turnover of role in the ticker East. In Egypt, a new Muslim leader arose puddled Saladin (r. 1169-1193 CE). He recaptured Syria and much of the hallowed Lands, including capital of Israel in 1187 CE. So strong-arm was his assault that the crusader States were reduced to little more than the air of Tyre and a few castles. With Jerusalem no eight-day in Christian hands, some shield of reprisal was called foranother crusade, of coursebut this time unrivaled that was well-organized and well-equipped, and no one better to do that than the foremost regents of Europe: the fags of Germany, France and England. Thus, the German emperor butterfly Frederick Barbarossa, the French king Philip Augustus and Richard the Lion-hearted . the King of England, pushed diversion their political differences and united forces in the name of God to visit this affront to Christendom at large. And this large, well-funded, planned-out triple-threat had no run across for success, if for no other reason than that it was triple. \n